Feb 17, 2012
Campaign to End Corporate Money in Politics Heats Up
New Mexico is now the second state, following Hawaii's lead, where lawmakers in the Senate are on record strongly opposing Citizens United and corporate money in politics. Read More
CWA, our Legislative Political Action Teams in every district and our progressive allies are fighting back against the flood of corporate dollars that is destroying our democratic process. Click to learn how.
In its January 2010 Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court turned election and political spending upside down. With the Court’s determination that “corporations are people too,” with free speech rights and other individual liberties, it eliminated the campaign spending restrictions that were put in place more than a century ago to stop corporations and other groups from exerting undue influence and spending millions of dollars and more in the electoral process.
It’s true that the Supreme Court decision also allows unions and other trade associations to spend unlimited dollars and form “Super PACs,” but union and association spending is dwarfed by the millions of dollars from corporations and the wealthy that are flooding into issue and candidate campaigns. And it’s all done in secret because Super PACs aren’t required to disclose their donors.
The 2010 midterm election campaign was the most expensive in U.S. history. Corporations alone spent $2 billion, with hundreds of millions more spent by “independent” groups that did not disclose their donors. Of the spending by the top ten outside groups in the 2010 elections, 89 percent came from corporate-backed and radical groups like American Crossroads. More still will be spent in 2012.
Political spending limits and restrictions had been in place for more than a century, first adopted by reformers in the “Gilded Age” in 1907 to stop the owners of America’s biggest banks and railroads from using their vast wealth to determine who was elected to Congress and the White House.
Those days are back. Here’s what the Citizens United decision did:
Elections in the United States aren't supposed to be for sale to the highest bidder. But the Citizens United decision has given the upper hand to corporations and the wealthy who have millions to spend, and it allows them to do so pretty much in total secrecy and in misleading ways.
CWA will continue to work with alliance partners like Common Cause to get corporate money out of politics and help make the American political process work for working families.
Feb 17, 2012
New Mexico is now the second state, following Hawaii's lead, where lawmakers in the Senate are on record strongly opposing Citizens United and corporate money in politics. Read More
Feb 3, 2012
More than 700 CWA activists covered Capitol Hill as part of CWA's Legislative-Political conference in Washington. Their message to senators, representatives and staff: we're fighting back to restore democracy and economic justice for working families. CWA activists visited more than 350 congressional offices. Read More
Jan 26, 2012
CWA, working with several organizations determined to restore our democracy, spotlighted the destructive influence of corporate money in politics in actions and events tied to the Jan. 20 anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling. Read More
Jan 26, 2012
Ever since the 2010 Supreme Court "Citizens United" decision declared that corporations and other groups could spend as much as they wanted in political campaigns, money has become a harmful and corrosive influence in American politics. Read More
Jan 24, 2012
The Communications Workers of America commends President Obama for his focus on creating an America that is built to last with an economy that works for everyone, not just a wealthy few. In addition, an America built to last cannot be one in which corporate money determines who is elected and what issues are debated. Read More